The soft request budget resolved to `SOFT_REQUEST_BUDGET[agent.name] ??
configured`, so the bundled entries for scout and sonic replaced the
configured value outright. Lowering `task.softRequestBudget` to tighten
the guard therefore did nothing for exactly the two agents that spawn
most often: a scout kept its 100-request budget no matter how small the
user set the knob. Only 0 (disable) and raising the value for
non-bundled agents had any effect.
Treat both numbers as upper bounds and take the smaller one. The bundled
entries stay ceilings, so a runaway scout is still stopped at 100 by
default and existing behavior is unchanged for anyone who has not
lowered the setting; a configured 0 still disables the guard entirely.
Resolution moves into `resolveSoftRequestBudget`, which also normalizes
negative and fractional inputs, so the rule is testable without standing
up a subprocess run.
This composes with `task.maxEffort` on a separate axis: effort caps how
hard each request thinks, this caps how many requests a run may spend.
(cherry picked from commit f0db29f8f725f11390b64ca9342300c482ff5c5d)
Nik Divjak
c3011fff3c