From 34c74c4f5287a57d860d6f8ce6530c369407fbef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: can1357 Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2026 17:27:26 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] test(stats): align backfill test with v6 key The PR bumped USER_MESSAGES_BACKFILL_KEY to user_messages_v6, but the behavior-backfill regression still seeded the dead user_messages_v5 sentinel, so it no longer exercised the user-messages backfill reset path. Point both fixtures at v6. Addresses review feedback on #2457. --- packages/stats/test/behavior-backfill.test.ts | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/packages/stats/test/behavior-backfill.test.ts b/packages/stats/test/behavior-backfill.test.ts index dd9936687..a49aa65f8 100644 --- a/packages/stats/test/behavior-backfill.test.ts +++ b/packages/stats/test/behavior-backfill.test.ts @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ describe("behavior backfill", () => { const database = new Database(getStatsDbPath()); database .prepare("INSERT OR REPLACE INTO meta (key, value) VALUES (?, ?)") - .run("user_messages_v5", "1778589361860"); + .run("user_messages_v6", "1778589361860"); database .prepare("INSERT OR REPLACE INTO meta (key, value) VALUES (?, ?)") .run("user_message_links_v1", "1778589361862"); @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ describe("behavior backfill", () => { closeDb(); const database = new Database(getStatsDbPath()); - database.prepare("INSERT OR REPLACE INTO meta (key, value) VALUES (?, ?)").run("user_messages_v5", "pending"); + database.prepare("INSERT OR REPLACE INTO meta (key, value) VALUES (?, ?)").run("user_messages_v6", "pending"); database .prepare("INSERT OR REPLACE INTO meta (key, value) VALUES (?, ?)") .run("user_message_links_v1", "pending");